Re: ( Rating: 3, Insightful)
Except that online real might doesn’t have relevance whatever, and people on slashdot pick through to spelling, punctuation and sentence structure all the time, thus I think the truth that she had been a woman had nothing in connection with the punctuation trolling that is actual.
Much more likely the amount of attention she actually is getting is basically because any woman posting on slashdot is intellectually attractive, and geeks just want to talk to her (at least until they see a photo of her, though possibly she’s pretty, that knows: p ). We posit that in this instance, many
Re: Talking without interacting?? ( rating: 5, Insightful)
Communication functions at numerous amounts.
You might concur that the particular topic is a topic of “low value”. Nevertheless, what they’re doing is building the conext of communication, which will be a signal “we have always been right right here for you personally, sharing my time by having a Null topic, and I also have always been available when you yourself have something more difficult to talk about. “
Males often make use of the heuristic that such product “worsens the noise-signal ratio”. During the extremes, you receive taciturn males whose whole message for the afternoon is “Your wall’s burning. “
To be completely reasonable, though ( rating: 4, Insightful)
To be totally reasonable, though:
1. We have seen cases that are extreme the talk included no intention of interacting any such thing whatsoever.
2. It absolutely was by males too.
Probably the most case that is pathologic’ve seen ended up being one co-worker whom simply could not shut up. Literally. You can walk out work and hear him still chatting within an empty space.
But to illustrate why we state that interaction wasn’t the point: i have had him arrived at me personally when to inquire of by what one of my techniques did. The talk went sorta similar to this:
Okumaya devam et